Breast Cancer Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Breast Cancer, including details on symptoms, genetics, screening, treatment, information. | ||||||||
|
Comparison of 1- and 2-year screening intervals for women undergoing screening mammography.Wai ES, D'yachkova Y, Olivotto IA, Tyldesley S, Phillips N, Warren LJ, Coldman AJ Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, 2410 Lee Ave, Victoria, BC, Canada V8R 6V5. ewai@bccancer.bc.ca We compared the long-term impact of 1- and 2-year screening mammography intervals using prognostic, screening, and outcome information for women aged 50-74 years obtained from the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia in two time periods, prior to 1997 (policy of annual mammography) and after 1997 (biennial mammography). Survival was estimated for both periods using a prognostic model and the expected rate of interval and screen-detected cancers. The likelihood of a screen-detected cancer with annual screening was 2.32 per thousand screens and with biennial screening was 3.32 per thousand screens. The prognostic profile of screen-detected cancers was better than that of interval cancers. Among both screen-detected and interval cancers, the prognostic profiles with annual and biennial screening were similar. The estimated breast cancer-specific survival rates for women undergoing annual and biennial screening mammography were 95.2 and 94.6% at 5 years, and 90.4 and 89.2% at 10 years, respectively. Annual compared to biennial mammography was associated with a 1.2% increase in the estimated 10-year breast cancer-specific survival for women aged 50-74 years, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer after screening programme attendance. Published 9 March 2005 in Br J Cancer, 92(5): 961-6.
© 2004-2008 Breast Cancer Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
