Breast Cancer Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Breast Cancer, including details on symptoms, genetics, screening, treatment, information.

The role of FDG-PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer.

Radan L, Ben-Haim S, Bar-Shalom R, Guralnik L, Israel O

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer is crucial to selection of the most appropriate therapy. The current study evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent breast cancer in patients who presented with elevated serum tumor markers. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive FDG-PET/CT studies of 46 women (aged 32-79 years; mean, 59.9 years) with a history of breast cancer presented with elevated serum tumor markers 1-21 years (mean = 6.2 years) after their initial diagnosis and were retrospectively evaluated. PET/CT results were confirmed by pathology (n = 11), further imaging, and follow-up (mean = 17.2 months; n = 36). Changes in further management based on PET/CT were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty (65%) patients had tumor recurrence, and 16 (35%) patients showed no further evidence of disease. Thirty-one patients had 32 abnormal PET/CT studies, and 15 patients had normal studies with an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90%, 71%, and 83%, respectively. In 37 patients, PET/CT was compared with contrast-enhanced CT and had a higher sensitivity (85% vs 70%), specificity (76% vs 47%), and accuracy (81% vs 59%). PET/CT had an impact on the management of 24 (5l%) patients. Of these, chemotherapy or radiotherapy was started in 16 patients, treatment was modified in 2 patients, and 6 patients were referred to biopsy, followed by referral to surgery for 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with breast cancer and rising tumor markers, FDG-PET/CT had high performance indices and was superior to CT for diagnosis of tumor recurrence, which led to changes in the subsequent clinical management of 51% of these patients.

Published 27 November 2006 in Cancer, 107(11): 2545-51.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2004-2008 Breast Cancer Research Today. All Rights Reserved.