Breast Cancer Research - Symptoms, Genetics, Screening, Treatment, Information

Breast Cancer Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Breast Cancer, including details on symptoms, genetics, screening, treatment, information.


Breast Cancer Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Breast Cancer

Books on Breast Cancer

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The influence of HRT on technical recall in the UK Breast Screening Programme: are pain, compression force, and compressed breast thickness contributing factors?

Nimmo LJ, Alston LA, McFadyen AK

Division of Radiography, School of Health and Social Care, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. l.nimmo@gcal.ac.uk <l.nimmo@gcal.ac.uk>

AIM: To investigate recall for technical reasons within the UK Breast Screening Programme, and to determine whether differences exist in those women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT), considering potential associations with reported pain, compression force used and compressed breast thickness (CBT) obtained. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective cohort study of 2765 women attending for incident round breast screening appointments who were either HRT users, with a minimum of 1 year duration (n=1077), or had never used HRT (n=1688). Data were collected using technical recall records, a radiographer data-collection sheet, and a self-administered participant questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-eight (2.5%) participants were recalled for technical reasons of whom 28 (2.6%) were HRT and 40 (2.4%) non-HRT users. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.80). Significant differences were found for CBT between those HRT users who were and were not recalled for technical reasons (p<0.01) and for the similar categories of non-HRT users (p=0.03). No significant differences were found for force between those HRT users who were recalled or not (p=0.73) and for the similar categories of non-HRT users (p=0.07). Similarly no significant differences were found for pain between those HRT users who were recalled or not (p=0.75) and for the similar categories of non-HRT users (p=0.73). CONCLUSION: CBT was the only variable to have both a statistically and a clinically significant relationship with technical recall.

Published 2 April 2007 in Clin Radiol, 62(5): 439-46.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Breast Cancer Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Breast Cancer Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (August)
  Issue 2 (September)
  Issue 3 (October)
  Issue 4 (November)
  Issue 5 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Breast Cancer Books

Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment: Medical Specialists and Cancer Survivors Tell You What You Need to Know (A Johns Hopkins Press Health Book)

Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment: Medical Specialists and Cancer Survivors Tell You What You Need to Know (A Johns Hopkins Press Health Book)